2021-04-09 - Consortia SIG Notes
Link to recording
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1b_yJbXpAGbbffEzJKTRo-hx3UkHQzmSA/view?usp=sharing
- Date
Announcements
Attendees
dkook
Jill Morris
Goals
Notes
Discussion items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product Council Updates | Roadmap Process: https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/display/PC/FOLIO+Roadmap+Process Inquire with sysops about implementation models/differences documentation User Management: Permissions management Note taker? | ||
| Additional Survey Responses Review | Review list and provide feedback, but seems to mostly align with the SIG's rankings. We wish to get feedback from libraries outside of North America. | ||
| Steve Bischof - Five Colleges Implementation | Steve to discuss 5 Colleges implementation decision, experiences/updates, and functionality needed Been a consortia for 50 years. 3 years ago were looking at what was next after Aleph They wanted to cooperate more, so looked at the single tenant model. Want a shared patron file Single bibliographic record for all. Be more cooperative. But want ERM separate Live on ERM. Some of the libraries used Coral. Orgs, agreements, connected to HLM. The crux of their model is shared inventory and patron management. Shared Circulation Needed acquisitions units. They are testing how this will work. Helping identify a model that might be needed in other areas of FOLIO. They did not think about the vendor file. Acq units does not apply there so they are using prefaces on the vendors. Pushing off going live this summer. They were worried about some of the Iris features. A number of them were confident they could have run the library, but some were concerned about the non-consortia features such as search, bulk edits, etc. Question: Shared patron file. Did 5C do that previous to FOLIO. Yes. Noah, we do that as well. Noah, can certain fields of patron data be hidden. No, not yet. %C just stores basic data. No addresses for example. On the success. They are merging their records right now as they move from Aleph. Dropping from 7 million records down to 5 million. Performance seems pretty good. Noah: Does each institution have their own ERM. They all have their own HLM and KB which is tied to logins. They do use some prefixes. They can see each other's subscriptions. Noah: Patrons can place holds on any item in any institution? Yes. They have given consistent rights to all users in FOLIO except for local patrons (walk ins). They have limited rights to borrow only based on location. Can they see items across the 5 libraries and place holds? Yes. ***This is the unmediated cross borrowing that the group would like to see in multi-tenant. This can be done natively in EDS. There don't have an OPAC. Where does that get recorded? Who gets to record that transaction? Service points work really well. They report based on location. Noah: Acquisitions and budgets. They are distinct for each institution. One problem: You could report on other library funds. This will require cleaning up in the future. Inconsistent with vendors. The different account numbers per library are now handled with prefixes. Are any the libraries maintain their own public catalog. No. They used a single shared public catalog on EDS. Thinking about Vufind in the future. How are they maintaining ILL across external consortia. The same units exist and they expect to continue to used Rapid and NCIP. Steve's top requests:
When you made the decision to go with the single tenant setup, was that based onAleph experience? Yes. And we wanted to collaborate more. We have alot in common and many joint plans. A lot of copies of the same titles. We wanted circ very integrated across the libraries. | ||
Single / Multi Tenant Functionality & Questions | |||
| Consortium Test Machine / Configuration | Discuss / Questions / Proposal? Bugfest for consortia features in FOLIO. Can we have a test case for consortia? Harry and Peter to secure data, determine cost estimate. Harry to discuss with CC & PC to secure funding. |