- Dracine Hodges
- Jacquie Samples
- Jessica Janecki
- Christie Thomas
- Felix Hemme
- Mary S Alexander
- Lisa Furubotten
- Michael Knarr
- Patty Wanninger
- Jason Kovari
- Sarah Schmidt
- Charlotte Whitt
|Product Council Update|
WolfCon was recapped. They spoke about gap analysis and priorities. Part of the gap analysis work will be given to the Early Implementers group. This is a high level functional gap analysis. MM SIG is focused on data gap analysis vs. functional analysis. They talked about the formation of a Technical Council. There is a group that is drafting a proposed charter that will be presented to the Product Council next month. How would they handle the GDP requirements surrounding data. That is an area that would fall under the purview of this new Technical Council.
A working meeting was discussed as a possible need for the future.
EBSCO has agreed to fund a quality assurance for FOLIO.
|WolfCon followup list|
Instance UX design continued discussion will held on Tues May 22 and the Holdings and Items UX design session on Thurs May 24.
Discussion of a package record. Laura is working on establishing a working definition for what a package means to MM. Ann-Marie suggested including the Acquisitions group in this discussion. Lynn also noted the need to distinguish this idea from a concept that is similar with Bound-withs and Analytics.
We need a good working definition for "Inventory." Laura and Lynn worked up a draft definition. They will work on a data dictionary. Charlotte suggested making using documents in place already with some of this information.
Data Migration sub-group Gap Analysis of the Inventory Instance, Holdings, and Items data model: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JnvLq-pQ861pNnW_AEn0xsSujr9yTuM8MOHSWJ_XSZA/edit?usp=sharing
Jacquie asked if a data dictionary and glossary are both needed? How are we defining "data dictionary" itself? Ann-Marie said the ERM group discussed a similar issue with ambiguity in terms. Dracine recommended the scope be focused around FOLIO specific terminology.
Dracine said the data dictionary is for subject matter experts as well as developers. She has noted a large disparity from each SIG's definition. Dracine said there is an existing glossary, but there is a need to document the MM SIG's definition of various terms. Dracine will include a link to the existing glossary. FOLIO Glossary: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17kRyXflyV-TZyS2sUbS1zTY1mZ83QUT6JxHJnr0w7hs/edit#gid=1426404785
|Recommendations for Inventory developers|
create Data elements for Resource & Format in Instance record (source-value pairs; rdacontent & rdacarrier values for now)
create Material Type data element in Item record
|Discussion: should Holdings records also have Material Type value||Conversation started at WolfCon with RA SIG members|
|Folio Forum June 13(?) : Codex and Inventory search||Laura Wright|
Need volunteers to present, suggestions for catchy title
Laura expressed the need for a clear understanding and consensus as to what constitutes the Codex and Inventory. Laura wondered if it would be better to have a presentation on just the Inventory. Dracine suggested a WolfCon debrief.