please put an 'x' next to your name in the list below the "Discussion items" if you are attending. Thanks!
Recordings of meetings can be found in the Metadata_Management_SIG > Recordings folder on Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B7G8S7WF6N20YUM4My1oRTIxSHM
|Product Council Update|
Dracine gave the update on today's meeting. Cate Boeremagave an update on Product Owners. She introduced Lucy Lu who will be working with the Shanghai Libraries as a Product Owner. Lucy speaks Mandarin and English. Todd Olsen will be the new PO for SSO. Cate spoke about release notes based on feedback from Chalmers. Kirstin and Maike ZBW and WDR broadcasting will be going live with FOLIO. Chair elections for Chair and Vice Chair of Product Councils.
|Subgroup & other updates?|
Data Import: MARC Holdings-to-Inventory Holdings working group will meet next week to finalize the default map. If any libraries besides Alabama, Duke, and Texas A&M plan to store MARC Holdings in FOLIO, please tell Ann-Marie BreauxASAP.
|Cross-app searching use cases: search and results expectations?|
Are there additional use cases for cross-app searching?
Other use cases discussion
How would you expect results to display? (What/how much information?)
Cross-app Use Cases
Knowing all of the versions of an owned or accessible resource.
Need to search outside of FOLIO for owned or accessible resources.
Any place dummy records would be created could lead to a use case.
Crossing between levels of bibliographic data, like records for a series. This was discussed in relation to having container records.
Search results that show which institution in a consortium environment owns the resource. Consortia SIG?
Action: App Interaction SIG meets tomorrow. If you have other thoughts, message Laura or add info here so Laura can convey ideas.
|Feature review (ongoing)|
MARC authority & holdings data
Where will MARC holdings data be stored, where will authority data be stored? SRS for non-bibliographic MARC data?
Holdings: If a library chooses to store MARC Holdings, they will load into SRS. A default map will be used to populate Inventory Holdings. There are fields in Inventory Holdings not controlled by MARC. Not part of QuickMARC editor, yet. Expectation is that they are editable in MARCCat. MARCCat may be needed for complex serials, but QuickMARC should suffice for most use cases. Note that at the moment there is no way to create in QuickMARC, only edit. Duke has holdings records for all physical monograph resources. Nice to create FOLIO Inventory holdings, initiating an underlying MARC Holdings record.
Authorities: Do not manifest in Inventory in any way. They will be stored in SRS. They will be able to edit and create them in MARCCat. Some libraries do not store authorities locally. Duke does store MARC authorities locally. Cornell and Chicago store entire authority file locally, (Chicago, not stored in system currently, but Cornell does store in Voyager). They both use this for discovery. Discuss in Entities Management Working Group, as well as with Tiziana when she comes to our 6/18 meeting. Has needed work changed? Are architecture needs different?
Note from chat: "There could be an advantage of having authority records in Inventory when it comes to searching on different names and headings."
|Future MM meetings (ongoing)|
Add ideas here
|Ann Kardos||UMass Amherst|
|Charlotte Whitt||Index Data|
|Colin Van Alstine||Smith (FC)|
|x||Dennis Christman||Duke University|
|Douglas Chorpita||Goethe Uni Frankfurt|
|x||Dracine Hodges||Duke University|
|x||Jacquie Samples||Duke University|
|Jennifer Eustis||UMass Amherst|
|Jessica Janecki||Duke University|
|Kristen Wilson||Index Data|
|Lisa Furubotten||Texas A&M|
|Lisa McColl||Lehigh University|
|Niels Erik Nielsen|
|x||Lloyd Chittenden||Marmot Library Network|