|X||Sharon Beltaine||Cornell University||Sara Colglazier||Mount Holyoke College/Five Colleges|
|Elizabeth Berney||Duke University||Erin Nettifee||Duke University|
|Joyce Chapman||Duke University||Karen Newbery||Duke University|
|Jean Pajerek||Cornell University||X||Tod Olson||University of Chicago|
|Claudius Herkt-Januschek||SUB Hamburg||X||Scott Perry||University of Chicago|
|Doreen Herold||Lehigh University||Stefan Stadtherr||MPIL Heidelberg|
|Sarah Park||Duke University||X||Simona Tabacaru||Texas A&M|
|X||Clint Bellanger||Auburn University||X||Kevin Walker||The University of Alabama|
|X||Ingolf Kuss||hbz||Christie Thomas||University of Chicago|
|X||Joshua Lambert||Missouri State|
|Munich Technical University Library|
|Joanne Leary||Cornell University||Cheryl Malmborg||University of Chicago|
|X||Michael Patrick||The University of Alabama||X||Vandana Shah||Cornell University|
|X||Nassib Nassar||Index Data||X||Angela Zoss|
|X||Veit Köppen||University Magdeburg||Lisa DeCarolis||Smith College/Five Colleges|
|X||Linda Miller||Cornell University||X||Elena O'Malley|
|Matt Harrington||Duke University||Holly Mistlebauer||Cornell University|
|X||Jean Pajerek||Cornell University||X||Nancy Bolduc||Cornell University|
|X||Cathy Tuohy||Emmanuel College (FLO)||X||Eric Pennington||Texas A&M|
|X||Shirley Moentnish||Missouri State|
Today's Attendance Taker: Linda Miller
Today's notetaker: Michael Patrick
Last week's notetaker: Scott Perry
|Updates from Various Reporting Related Groups and Efforts||Various|
The Reporting SIG is using small work groups to address priorities and complete our work. Each week, we will provide updates to the Reporting SIG from these various reporting-related groups and efforts:
|LDP Table Naming||Nassib|
Nassib has asked that we review a few more LDP table mappings and naming.
(Explanation from a previous meeting)
At present, some table names use prefixes to remove ambiguity, e.g. /finance-storage/groups is mapped to finance_groups, while others do not use a prefix, e.g. loans, users, and groups, as they are considered to have a more general application. In other cases, it may not be obvious whether a prefix should be used, e.g. requests.
The advantages of using a prefix are clarity and leaving "room" in the namespace for more similarly named concepts in the future to co-exist with the current tables. The disadvantage is longer and more complex table names.
Now that queries are being developed, there will be an increasing number of dependencies on table names, and it is a good time to pause and give some thought to whether some of them should be changed, because it will be increasingly difficult to change them later without having to modify existing queries.
A spreadsheet with the table mappings and naming is linked here, and I would appreciate input from the Reporting SIG:
Reminder: The MVP project managers are interested in getting all the MVP tickets ranked by each institution. If your institution has still not ranked the reporting clusters, please urge them to do so soon. We need this for both MVP and prioritization for what reports to build next within the Reporting SIG. Thank you!
|Organizing work in the Reporting SIG||All|
Let's discuss some ideas for dividing our work into functional area report development teams:
|Topics for Future Meetings||All|
Review and update Topics for Future Reporting SIG Meetings
- Community and Coordination group to discuss how to maintain GDPR compliance for REP 147 and REP 148
- Angela Zoss work with Nassib Nassar to go over names list, create final proposal
- Angela Zoss (?) to share proposed list with POs of SIGs to make sure changed names still make sense