...
Time | Item | Who | Notes | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 min | Scribe | All | Jakub Skoczen, followed by <??> | ||||||||
10 minutes max | TCR Board Review | All | nothing new | ||||||||
5 min | CC / PC Updates |
| |||||||||
1 min | Elections | All |
| ||||||||
1 min | WOLFcon planning |
| |||||||||
5-10 min | Technical Council Sub Groups Updates | All |
| ||||||||
5 min | Upcoming meetings | ||||||||||
5-10 min | RFCs | All |
| ||||||||
5-10 min | Possible Budget Surplus |
| |||||||||
5-10 min | Officially Supported Technologies - Upkeep | All |
| ||||||||
5-10 min | All |
| |||||||||
time permitting | Terminology Document | All |
| ||||||||
Other | Craig McNally mentioned that there were concerns about relaxing tenant separation in the consortia module. Should the TC discuss this during a Monday morning meeting? Ingolf Kuss it should be discussed with the Security group along with the architects of the functionality (Olamide Kolawole) rather than on the TC Craig McNally let's schedule it for the following Monday and take it from there, next steps could involve creating a sub-group or involving the security team. Craig will check with the sec team about it. Marc Johnson suggests that we use the reminder of time to discuss the sec aspect of the RFC but Olamide Kolawole has left | ||||||||||
Topic Backlog | |||||||||||
Action Items
...