Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


Page properties



Agenda

  1. Review Retro Board (10 mins)
  2. Voting (2 mins)
  3. Discussion (15 mins)
  4. Summary Actions (3 mins)


Participants

  •  


Apologies 

Retrospective



Panel
borderColor#c4a246
bgColor#fcf5de

Personal highlights

  • More comfortable with project structure and processes
  • Happy with the rhythm currently present in the project sprints
  • Better understanding of Grails and the project technologies, although at the expense of the first iteration taking longer.
  • Code reuse between the 2 UI modules.
  • Had time to pick up smaller tasks


Panel
borderColor#91c89c
bgColor#f3f9f4

What went well

  • Feedback loop from testing to bugs being raised
  • Transition form internal orgs to mod-organization-storage went fairly smoothly
  • The management of the dev process seemed to be smoother.


Panel
borderColor#d04437
bgColor#fff8f7

What caused problems

  • This project is often at bleeding-edge, and that can cause confusion as to where to find code or process that might be similar to what we want to achieve, to allow for reuse
  • Testing can be problematic when we rely on 3rd party plugins. i.e. Find Org
  • Onboarding time and learning curve for Grails and related techs we use are often high at the beginning of a developers involvement.
  • JIRA is often not updated inline with the projects processes.


Discussion Notes

  • JIRA is often not updated inline with the projects processes

Actions

  •