Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »




  • Begin review of gap analysis prioritizations

Discussion items



  • F2F next week; no SIG meeting on 6/19

Gap analysis prioritization review

  1. Prepare for session
    1. Assign someone to update the JIRA features with more details as they are discussed.  This way the PO just needs to talk and someone else will record what they say for everyone to see going forward.
    2. Ask all SIG members to have the spreadsheet at open so they can edit the Rank for their institution as the features are discussed (the spreadsheet has both an Original Rank and New Rank field for each institution)
  2. You may want to start by looking at the ranking order of the features—or you can just jump to step #3 below
    1. Does anything look “off”?   In other words, something is ranked very high/low inappropriately--you may want to address obvious issues immediately
    2. Are any dependencies out of order?  Some have already been fixed—you can update the rank in the New PO Rank field, which is to the right of the Original PO Rank field
  3. Review features with SIG to clarify what they are (while discussing, assigned person should be updating JIRA issue with clarifying information). SIG members should be discussing these questions:
    1. Is this really a go-live feature?  (if not, update working spreadsheet for institution)
    2. If it is, is there really just a part of the feature that is needed at go-live?  Could we split out that part of it?
    3. Is there a reasonable workaround for all or part of the feature?
  4. After the feature has been discussed, place a “Yes” in the Processed? column--there is also a column for Comments
  5. The results will be shared with the Product Council and the institutions so that any discrepancies can be addressed and resolved ASAP


Action items

  • No labels