Please put the new/open comments at the top, so that the closed/on hold ones will drop toward the bottom, as the list becomes longer.
|4/18/2018||Patty Wanninger||any||Occasionally when I working in the snapshot or testing environment, using Chrome on a Windows 10 machine, I will take an action and the screen will blank to repaint, but then it hangs there. I can make it paint by refreshing the page. It is intermittent, though, so would be very hard to make a ticket for. Does anyone else experience this blank screen?||Open|
|3/26/2018||Comment reported by Charlotte Whitt||Contributor Search in Inventory and in Codex Search|
At MM-SIG meeting on 3/22/2018 we talked about if we need Contributor Search in Inventory to be the name searched in direct order. Right now the name is indexed last name first, and it's only searchable that way. The MM-SIG was not clear here: Lynn W. thought it should be fixed, and Jacquie S. thinks as long as it is clear. Search on Organizational would be as browse search.
Jacquie mentioned that probably Codex Search should provide the search on contributors in direct order, while this search interface are used by all staff.
Charlotte Whitt suggests this to be evaluated in UAT.
|3/22/2018||ICs, reported by Ann-Marie Breaux||Permissions||Having to click permissions one at a time to add to a user is awful, especially as the number of permissions grow. Would it be possible to add control-click so that you could click a bunch of permissions at once and then add them? And/or shift-click to add a whole list of permissions at once?||Open|
|3/15/2018||Charlotte Whitt||Inventory Search|
When an Unambiguous Match Search is followed by another Unambiguous Match, the Detailed Record does not update correctly if the reset button is not cleared between the two searches. The UX indicate reset the button to the right of the search box, but this may easily be ignored by the user. Two unambiguous searches in a row is an edge case!
Charlotte have filed a draft bug-report UIIN-111
Maybe this case is more a question for a User test.
|3/8/2018||FC reported by Patty Wanninger||Users display|
We noticed in testing - STCOM-164Getting issue details... STATUS that when you first login to the site as diku_admin, the Users page opens with nothing checked so it is blank. However, once you check "active" and see the users, you can continue to see users even if you reset the filters ("x" them out so nothing is selected), on the users page and when you navigate to another tab and back again. Is this the expected behavior?
|3/1/2018||Ann-Marie Breaux||Inventory display|
Identifier numbers in the FOLIO instance display do not have the correct labels. For example, some are being labeled as ISBNs when they are definitely not. See attached.
|2/22/2018||Searching items by barcode||It seems to me there should be a barcode search in inventory now that it is merged with item functionality. Right now, it seems the only barcode search of items is in checkout, checkin, and requests. A library will often have only a barcode and wants to be able to enter or scan it as a search key.||Closed - known issue||Cate Boerema|
Barcode searching in Inventory was working previously but it has been intentionally disabled while the team works through some performance issues. We can expect it to be re-enabled soon. Thanks!
|2/21/2018||Testing||It sure would be nice to get exactly the same set of Users and Item data that gets loaded everytime there is a rebuild so we can use the same data and record URLs ( item example ) when testing and when reporting an issue. Currently user names, user uuids, user barcodes and instance/holding/item uuids are different after rebuild (item barcode is the same but does not have a url).||Closed - in backlog||Cate Boerema|
FSE IC team
|It would be very nice to be able to facet a user search by:Open loans, Active Requests, Proxy/Sponsor/User permissions (if they have any)||Open||Will follow up with Patty to confirm Use Cases.|
FSE IC Team
|Users||When viewing a list of users, all columns sort ascending/descending properly except the inactive/active column (the first column). Enter this as a bug?||Closed - in backlog||Cate Boerema|
we proposed labeling the tab itself Sponsor/Proxy instead of just Proxy. Also, we would like the "Sponsors" tab to be labeled something like "User is Proxy for" and the "Proxy" tab labeled "User is Sponsor of."
Or some similar language that implies
Add'l notes from Ann-Marie: these headers (Sponsor/Proxy) are very confusing, so if they can be relabeled or shown in a graphical way (who is the sponsor, who is the proxy/proxies)
At the least, in the individual user, it needs to be super-clear (on the subordinate) that I am sponsored by (important person) and (on the higher-level person) that I have this proxy or these proxies. "By" and "For" seem like important words to make the relationship between the 2 users more clear.
|Closed - completed|
Refined mock-ups based on input and reviewed with the RA SIG. The following new designs were approved and necessary changes will be put into the development backlog. Thanks much for your input and let us know if you have any remaining concerns!
FSE IC team
reported by Patty Wanninger
|We note that currently, you can set up a Sponsor or a Proxy with a date in the past. Perhaps there are use cases to do so, but we think it would be nice to get a pop-up that tells you that date is in the past.||On hold||Thanks for this feedback. This warning popup you suggest does seem like a nice-to-have. I'd like to wait for a little more user feedback on its importance before prioritizing it for development.|
FSE IC Team, reported by Patty Wanninger
In testing https://issues.folio.org/browse/UIREQ-47?filter=10466, we discovered that currently you must fill in an item before you can look for a requestor. Often, a staff member will not have a known item when doing a request, or wants to place the request at the title level and any available copy will do. So it's our opinion that you should be able to start a request either by item, and attach the requestor to it, or by requestor, and attach an item to that person. Also, it might be necessary to be able to search items by something other than a barcode, because, as explained above, sometimes you don't know the number or you want a title-level hold.
Also, if you clear the field of an item that is currently displayed, it does not clear the details of that item, which is confusing. What happens is a red-letter note appears under the search box which says, "Please select an item," but the ghost text says "Please scan or enter an item." So the red text at least should say, "Please scan or enter an item."
FSE IC Team
|Navigation between Requests and Users|
• When you move away from an app, and then come back to it, FOLIO seems to leave the app in the last display state it was.
Screenshots and more explanation in the attached PPT.
|Closed - in backlog|
Thanks, Ann-Marie Breaux. This seems like a bug. Can you please file one in UIU and label it "sprint32"? The summary should be something like "User detail record should alway open when accessing via link" and the steps to repro are as you outlined. Expected behavior is that the user detail record is open when accessed via link. Actual behavior is that the user detail record is closed when accessed via link.
Done: see UIU-384. Thanks, Cate Boerema!