Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
Submitted Date

 

Approved Date

 

StatusACCEPTED
ImpactMEDIUM

 

Overrides/Supersedes 

This decision was migrated from the Tech Leads Decision Log as part of a consolidation process.  The original decision record can be found here.

RFC 

N/A

Stakeholders

Jakub Skoczen Adam Dickmeiss Julian Ladisch 

Contributors

Jakub Skoczen

Approvers

This decision was made by the Tech Leads group prior to the adoption of current decision making processes within the FOLIO project.

Background/Context

The Platform team has been working on restructuring RAML-to-Java generation in RMB to remove the need for dependencies at runtime that should be really be compile-time only. See RMB-785 - Implementation/Testing/Code Review: Convert GenerateRunner into maven plugin CLOSED for details. From the module implementers viewpoint the following changes will be required in pom.xml:


The Platform team would like your feedback on whether these changes should be considered breaking (RMB v33) or minor (RMB v32.2).

Assumptions

N/A

Constraints

N/A

Rationale

N/A

Decision

Build changes (new RMB Maven plugin) will be released as new major RMB release (v33)

Implications

  • Pros
    • N/A
  • Cons
    • N/A

Other Related Resources

1 Comment

  1. A change to the pom file in itself is not a breaking change. Then all  RMB updates would be breaking changes as you at least must point to the "next" version.

    For the RMB-785 case where major surgery was required in pom.xml there were also changes to the API. So : clearly a breaking change.

    RMB-785 was for RMB 33.0.0.