Discussion tems


5minLogic for due date calculation checkCate BoeremaReview of logic for truncated due date calculationHave I captured the expected logic correctly in the SIG meeting notes? (#8 under Loan policy mockup section in Meeting outcomes section):
20minRequest-related noticesDarcy BranchiniUI optionsDecisions on UI and field options for request related notices.
20minDisabling and deleting service pointsCate Boerema
What if a SP is created by accident or is no longer in use? Deleting SPs is challenging because of the various dependencies. Should we inactivate instead? What's the expected behavior in both cases for locations, requests and loans that use the SP?

Meeting Outcomes

Functional Area

Product Owner

Planned Release (if known)

Decision Reached


Link to Supporting Materials


e.g. loans, fees/finesNamee.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019Clearly stated decision
  • Because...
  • Because...
e.g. mock-up, JIRA issue
RequestsCate BoeremaQ1When an item is recalled, calculate today's date plus the recall return interval. If the resulting date (RD) is sooner than the original due date (ODD), use the RD. If the RD is later than the original due date, use the ODD. If the RD is less than the minimum guaranteed due (MGD), use the MGD.
  • Originally proposed logic assumed we never want to extend the original due date when an item is recalled because recalls should shorten loans, not extend them. Both Andrea and Kai thought this logic would work best for their needs.
  • That said, it turns out some institutions do want to extend the original due date for recalled items (e.g. Chicago). This is because the original loan may have been renewable with a low fee structure. You want to give borrowers a bit of time to return the item in the case of a recall, as they may not have been expecting to have to return at the original due date and because the fee structure may now be much steeper
  • We could make this a configuration option in the loan policy (e.g. "never extend original due date when recalled") - Andrea asked we put this in the parking lot
  • Those not wanting to extend the loan when recalled could set the recall return interval to 0
    • When the item is recalled prior to the Minimum guaranteed loan period, this gives Andrea and Kai exactly the behavior they wanted
    • But when the item is recalled after the Minimum guaranteed loan period, a recall return interval of 0 doesn't give the patron much (any!) time to return the book.
    • Andrea concluded she would set the recall return interval to 1 day and accept that it would sometimes extend the original loan period. Kai would set the recall return interval to 0.


UM reporting update

Due date calculation


How do minimum guaranteed loan period, original due date, and recall return interval interact when an item has been recalled?

Stress case: using the recall return interval to extend any loan by X number of days may have the effect of _extending_ a loan, even on a non-renewable item

Proposed solutions

Workaround: Use recall return interval to set up the appropriate degree of generosity to the patron whose item has been recalled

Ideal (parking lot): Create a separate setting at the policy level (not tenant) to decide whether original due date or current date + recall return interval is used

Request notices

Question about whether the policies are containers for (loan, fee/fine, request) and a loan rule points to one container, or are the policies broken up and the circ rule points to individual policies

Request notice configurations

Fields in policy:

Darcy showed possible configurations for request available, request available reminder, cancellation, and hold expired, as well as for recall notices