Date

Attendees

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
5 minSecurity Question
  • Github alerts when there are known vulnerabilities in a repository... In some cases these have gone ignored for quite some time.
    • Should the TC mandate that these be addressed in a "timely" manner? Answer - No. Rely on Security Team's process.
    • Leave it up to the security team to decide on a case-by-case basis?
  • Craig McNally will raise for discussion at the next Security Team meeting (Friday)
    • Review and ensure JIRAs exist for all existing vulnerabilities reported by github
    • Triage/prioritize each and assign to teams as needed.
    • Investigate how to manage this better going forward - is there some automated way to get these into JIRA?


10 minUI Testing

Discuss the need for investigation/review of our UI testing strategy and recommendations/requirements based on current tech/framework and state of coverage, level of effort, etc.

  • Broadly, there are two types of UI tests: integration tests (full-stack) that operate against a production UI build backed by a live backend, and functional or unit tests (UI-only) that operate against a mocked backend.
    • integration tests are written in NightmareJS; it is not currently maintained and uses an outdated version of the Electron browser
    • unit tests are mostly written in BigTest v1, a framework that is now officially deprecated
  • We have substantial investment in both Nightmare and BigTest, but given their lack of maintenance, we are a bit stuck. 
  • Additional unit testing challenges we face regardless of the framework:
    • We don't have a good way to manage mocks for unit tests in a way that keeps them in sync with backend changes.
    • We don't have a good way to manage mocks for interfaces in a single place when multiple UI apps rely on the same interface. Currently, we maintain separate copies of mocks in separate UI repositories. 

Two real questions for now:

1) Should we review the technology, process and expectations (80%) for creation Unit tests. Consensus is yes. We'll review the requirements for both UI and backendAnton Emelianovvolunteers to kick this effort off. Will follow up in 3 weeks.

2) What do we do with modules that don't meet the test strategy requirements?

  • Note that MARCcat is being taken up by @Cult and Scanbit - the expectations are that they'll have 80% coverage for Unit tests.
  • Any module that has less than 80% needs to have "special exception" noted by Tech Council in order to be included in community builds.
  • We need to have a process to document that special exception.
  • UI-Courses had a "grandfathered" special exception because we thought tests were coming in Q2. It will not be included in the community releases in Q3 unless its code coverage meets our standards. 


45 minArchitectural Blueprint candidatesTC ChampionsWe didn't get to this - update shifted to next week (July 1). Update the TC on efforts and discussions on their items.